May 06, 2014

#CreativeDisruption Survey 3 Results

By Ben FitzGerald and Michael Horowitz

Thanks to everyone who participated in this survey and previous surveys. We’re extremely happy with the level of participation and the insights you have shared with us. As before, we have visualized the findings. Please find the results and some key takeaway points below.

FutureDefenseSurvey3_results_2.jpg 

1. Large majorities of survey respondents believe that a major power will develop and deploy a fully autonomous weapons system by 2030, use a directed energy weapon in combat, and use a UAV to shoot down a manned fighter or bomber. Yet respondents seemed much less confident that non-state actors or even minor powers would do any of these things. This suggests that respondents believe there will be some limits to the diffusion of military technology to minor powers and non-state actors in the information age.

2. Respondents were much more likely to think that cyber technology will be important for defending against attacks and network infrastructure than for offensive operations, as a new element in combined arms warfare, or for defending against kinetic attacks. This suggests a less expansive, though still incredibly consequential, role for cyber technology between now and 2030.

3. The technologies that respondents believe are most likely to be the subject of cutbacks on the part of major national militaries are manned fighters and bombers. This suggests that the spread of military robotics into core naval and ground arenas may be slower than in the air. These findings are also at odds with current budget priorities.

4. Respondents continue to see a trend of ongoing growth for commercial technologies and businesses in defense technology and capability.

5. Changes to the regulatory environment and reform seem unlikely with even an existential military threat not suggesting a significant probability of reform. Similarly, respondents thought that existing regulations are neither detrimental or significantly advantageous suggesting a lack of momentum for change. 

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • September 27, 2018
    China’s Quantum Future

    China should be a “global leader in innovation” by 2035, President Xi Jinping declared during the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th National Congress last October. His remarks re...

    By Elsa B. Kania

  • Podcast
    • August 13, 2018
    Technology and Innovation in an Era of U.S.-China Strategic Competition

    China has taken significant steps to implement national strategies and encourage investment aimed at surpassing the U.S. in high-tech fields like artificial intelligence. In t...

    By Elsa B. Kania

  • Commentary
    • ASPI
    • August 10, 2018
    Defence innovation is critical for the future of the Australia–US alliance

    The outcome of the recent AUSMIN meeting—the annual gathering of the secretaries of state and defence from the United States and the foreign and defence ministers from Austral...

    By Daniel Kliman & Brendan Thomas-Noone

  • Commentary
    • Defense One
    • July 27, 2018
    How the Five Eyes Can Harness Commercial Innovation

    Earlier this year, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and New Zealand – which along with the United States are members of the “Five Eyes” alliance – came together to collec...

    By Daniel Kliman & Brendan Thomas-Noone

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia